Friday, May 31, 2019

Pot, Its Whats for Dinner :: essays research papers

Cannabis, chronic, bud, weed, pot, grass, the list is endless. Harboring several names, marijuana use, is illegal in most of United States. In California, marijuana sight be convinced(p) to cancer patients, aids patients and people who suffer from glaucoma. But the recreational use is strictly prohibited in most of the 50 United States. Considering the liable r eveningue, the complaisant and health related factors of marijuana as opposed to legal substances like alcohol and cigarettes the recreational use of marijuana should be legal for social and frugal reasons. Marijuana has been proven to induce less side effects, or negative factors than either alcohol or cigarettes. Smoking cigarettes causes cancer, in several different forms, is physically addicting, and has enough other chemicals in it to kill small animals. Along with the extremely addicting nicotine, and tar-filled tobacco, cigarettes contain other chemical s such as rodenticide, formaldehyde, and sometimes even ammon ia. Still, it is legal to buy, and smoke. Alcohol, another prevalent evil in society, too can cause severe internal problems (liver disease), is psychologically addicting, and in large quantities can in fact be fatal (alcohol poisoning). Both these legal substances have proven more dangerous than marijuana. Marijuana is not physically addicting. In most cases, particularly if cultivated and smoked appropriately, it contains no other chemicals. One cannot overdose on marijuana or get pot poisoning. However, the government manages to ignore such proven facts, and maintains the legal sale and use of alcohol and tobacco products. Approximately $5.00 a day, $35.00 a week, $140.00 a month, and $7280.00 a year smoking a masses of cigarettes a day is costly habit. But theoretically, it is not that expensive to grow. So, where do the disparities in prices come from? The federal government has an extensive list of taxes, and tariffs put on tobacco. The taxes on a pack of cigarettes make up for more than 50% of the price. The tobacco industry is viewed as this inherent evil, and the government does all it can to thwart the industry, including the taxation of all tobacco products. If the government were to legalize marijuana for recreational purposes, the same taxes, and tariffs could be applied to the sales of marijuana cigarettes. The revenue placid from this would be astounding. With this revenue, more regulation could be enforced and it would soon be harder for kids and teenagers to acquire. And just like alcohol and cigarettes, a state license could be issued for the distribution, and a legal pot smoking age could be enforced.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Mathematics as Paideia in Proclus :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Mathematics as Paideia in ProclusABSTRACT I examine one aspect of the central role which mathematics plays in Procluss ontology and epistemology, with particular reference to his Elements of Theology. I focus on his peculiar horizons about the ontological status of mathematical objects and the special faculties of the soul that are problematical in understanding them. If they are merely abstract objects that are stripped away from sensible things, then they are unlikely to reorient the mind towards the transparent realm, as envisioned by Plato in the Republic. Thus, in order to defend the function of mathematics as a prodaideutic to dialectic, Proclus rejects Aristotelian abstractionism in party favour of an elaborate account in terms of Nous projecting images of its Forms through the medium of the imagination. In metaphorical terms, he replaces the Aristotelian image of the soul as a blank tablet with that of a tablet that has always been inscribed and is always writing itself, while also being written on by Nous. The mediating function of mathematics for understanding the higher realities is grounded in the fact that its central principles of Limit and Unlimited have a universal provenance in Procluss unhurt system of reality.IntroductionAlexander of Aphrodisias established abstractionism as an Aristotelian dogma about mathematical objects, but for later Neoplatonists this proved difficult to compensate with the educational function of mathematics in Platos philosophical curriculum. Thus Proclus, for example, rejected abstractionism as a basis for the ascent to the realm of Forms, and proposed an alternative view based on the typical Neoplatonic hierarchy of Nous, Soul, and Nature. At the highest noetic level, geometric Forms are unextended and indivisible, so that only at the level of Soul tail end they become available for study by the geometer when they are embodied in the intelligible matter supplied by the imagination. Proclus also accepted that geometrical forms evoke be embodied in sensible matter, though they never have the exactitude necessary for science, nor could they ever acquire it through abstraction. Thus the diagrams used by the geometer are products of the imagination, which are really projections by the higher intellect onto a lower level so as to facilitate the study of geometrical objects. Proclus seems to accept that the human intellect can never attain the Platonic goal of studying geometrical Forms in their pure and unextended form as paradigms. Although such a goal can be achieved only by divine Nous, yet it becomes for Proclus the guiding rationale for his whole system.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Euthanasia Essay - Should Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal? :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide

Should Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal?           Throughout the twentieth century, major scientific and medical advances have greatly enhanced the life forecast of the average person. However, there are many instances where doctors can preserve life artificially. In these cases where the patient suffers from a terminal disease or remains in a persistent vegetative state or PVS from which they cannot voice their wishes for continuation or termination of life, the question becomes whether or not the patient has the freedom to take in whether or not to prolong their life even though it may consist of pain and suffering. In answer to this question, proponents of physician-assisted suicide, most notably, Dr. Jack Kevorkian, are of the sound judgement that not only should patients be able to abstain from treatment, but if they have a terminal and/or extremely painful condition, they should be able to want out the assistance of a doctor in orde r to expedite their death with as little pain as possible. Contained herein are the arguments for and against the le galization of doctor-assisted suicide, as well as where the state courts stand in respect to this most delicate of issues. In the hopes of clarification, we must first distinguish between mobile and passive mercy killing. Passive euthanasia involves the patients refusal of medical assistance. It involves the right to die which is protected by the United States Constitution clauses of due process liberty and the right to concealment (Fourteenth Amendment). The right to doctor-assisted suicide, or active euthanasia, consists of, ...a patients right to authorize a physician to perform an act that intentionally results in the patients death, without the physicians being held civilly or reprehensively liable for having caused the death . The passive form of euthanasia was first deemed legal by the New Jersey State Supreme Court in 1976 In re Quinlan . In the Quinlan case, the court allowed a competent patient to terminate the use of life- sustaining medical machines to prolong life. Since New Jerseys decision, all fifty states have enacted uniform statutes which contain living will provisions. However, although the United States Supreme Court upheld the Quinlan decision in re Cruzan , it changed the parameters of passive euthanasia . With the Cruzan decision, the Supreme Court held that passive euthanasia was legal but only for competent adults or those who are

Humans Senses and Perceptions Essay -- Neurology Biology

Humanity is blessed with at least five senses with which we observe and cover our surroundings. Although our senses, and sense perceptions indeed are amazing, the knowledge gained by these faculties is sometimes misleading. The precedent why our senses, at times, err is twofold, first the sensory organs we are endowed with are not entirely accurate, and are not equipped to perceive and measure all information. The second reason for errors in perception is that we all interpret the data we revived via there organs differently. As Penelope Fitzgerald puts it, No two people see the external world in exactly the same way. To every separate person a thing is what he thinks it is -- in other words, not a thing, but a think. The combination of imperfect sensory organs, selective perception and varying interpretations of the sense data we receive accounts for this err.To write down with, our eyes do not see as clearly as we think they do. The actual raw image coming from our eyes is upsid e down, woolly and interlaced with blood vessels. Then, our mind corrects this image and fills in the gaps with whatever it presumes to be correct. However, our brains perceptions of what is correct varies greatly. Despite this the question assumes that our senses are perfect, which they are clearly not. I would reason that it is because we only have eyes to see with and ears to hear with that we err because we only have these faculties our brain must compensate, and everyone compensates differently. Society is fascinated by the flaws in our perception, utilise it for entertainment, and more recently in advertisements. The advertising industry is able to manipulate images and words in order to create the desired perception of the product. In this... ...( consultation and site) as the foundation for knowledge about the world around us. Works CitedPhilosophy Philosophy of Perception.ORIENTALIA Journal of Eastern Philosophy & Culture Papers, Dictionaries, Forum, Books Reviews. We b. 15 Jan. 2011. . psychological science Notes Sensation and Perception.AlleyDog.com - Psychology Students Best Friend. Web. 15 Jan. 2011. . Chisholm, Roderick. Gettier Problems - Page 4 - Philosophy - Wattpad.The Worlds Most Popular EBook Community . Web. 15 Jan. 2011. . 3 Quotations from Penelope Fitzgerald.Linguaspectrum - Interesting side of meat LessonsWeb. 15 Jan. 2011. .

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Civilization :: essays research papers

What is politeness? It actually involves the application of a serviceman view, a p fraudicular vision of human race to a human collectivity. Today this definition has become quite ambiguous in the minds of many people because of the eclipse of religion in the modern world and the spread to the rest of the globe since the 19th century.The importance of ethics. No civilization has not emphasized ethics. Actions have an effect on the soul. Actions are not indifferent. in that location is no exception, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Christianity. The idea that the structures of society must be bound by certain ethical norms which ultimately affect us as human beings natural for immortality. They are there to preserve certain values, the possibilities of certain attitudes, they are following certain religious life which itself is absolutely essential for human being to exist. In traditional civilization art was always an expression of the truths of religion. That is why w e distinguish between religious are and sacred art. Religious art is simply an art whose subject happens to be religious. Sacred art is an art whose very forms reflect realities, principles, whose symbols are meta individuals.Khazali Khorasan he is one of the most important Islamic figures of Islamic history. If civilization talks does not take into consideration the centrality of religion than everything else is secondary. Fortunately in the West there still remains something of Judaism and Christianity. It has not totally died out.So this dialogue between Islam and the West, or the Hindu world and the West, I think must first of all address those people in the West who still swear in both the reality and an ethical system which is in fact very similar to our own. All religions are at the heart of civilizations. There are several elements all based one way or another on religion but not identically with it which must be taken into consideration in serious civilization dialogue. F irst of all the world view. Presiding ideas which the religion itself in its philosophical, theological understanding. What is our ultimate understanding of reality. It that which determines how we act, how we think, how we look upon ourselves whether it is positive or negative.Tension Is more evident in the oriental, non-western world because colonialism took several centuries. But those tension are also becoming more and more evident for people in the West, between those who want to go back and live traditional life and many of whom have embraced Islam, or Buddhism.

Civilization :: essays research papers

What is culture? It actually involves the application of a domain of a function view, a p fine articular vision of humankind to a human collectivity. Today this definition has become quite ambiguous in the minds of many throng because of the eclipse of religion in the modern world and the spread to the rest of the globe since the 19th century.The importance of ethics. No civilization has not emphasized ethics. Actions have an effect on the soul. Actions ar not indifferent. at that place is no exception, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Christianity. The idea that the structures of society must be bound by certain ethical norms which ultimately affect us as human beings natural for immortality. They are there to preserve certain values, the possibilities of certain attitudes, they are following certain religious life which itself is absolutely essential for human being to exist. In traditional civilization art was always an expression of the truths of religion. That is why we distinguish between religious are and sacred art. Religious art is simply an art whose subject happens to be religious. Sacred art is an art whose very forms reflect realities, principles, whose symbols are meta individuals.Khazali Khorasan he is one of the most important Islamic figures of Islamic history. If civilization conversation does not take into consideration the centrality of religion than everything else is secondary. Fortunately in the West there still remains something of Judaism and Christianity. It has not totally died out.So this dialogue between Islam and the West, or the Hindu world and the West, I think must first of all address those people in the West who still swear in both the reality and an ethical system which is in fact very similar to our own. All religions are at the heart of civilizations. There are several elements all based one way or another on religion but not identically with it which must be interpreted into consideration in serious civili zation dialogue. First of all the world view. Presiding ideas which the religion itself in its philosophical, theological understanding. What is our ultimate understanding of reality. It that which determines how we act, how we think, how we look upon ourselves whether it is positive or negative.Tension Is more evident in the oriental, non-western world because colonialism took several centuries. But those tension are also becoming more and more evident for people in the West, between those who want to go back and live traditional life and many of whom have embraced Islam, or Buddhism.